Data at a Glance: 10 Essential Metrics for Orthodontic Practice Growth​ Infographic

September 26, 2025
|
2
min read
Stay up to date
Subscribe to our newsletter
breakdown of statistics to track for orthodontic practice growth

FAQs

What are the most important orthodontic growth metrics to track?

Track a tight set that covers your funnel (leads, exams, starts), revenue health, and operational drag: New Patient Adds to Exams, Case Acceptance, Starts from Observation, Phase 1 to Phase 2 Conversion, Average Contract Amount, Net Production vs. Net Collection, Starts Paid in Full, Patients Over EDC, No-Shows, and Repairs.

How do you calculate New Patient Adds to Exams, and what’s a strong benchmark?

Formula: Total Exams ÷ New Patients Added. Benchmark: >90% (infographic lists a U.S. average of 81%). If you’re low, tighten speed-to-schedule, confirmation/reminders, and remove friction before the first appointment.

How do you calculate case acceptance rate, and what should you aim for?

Formula: Treatment Starts (less Phase 2) ÷ Number of Exams Seen. Benchmark: 70–80%. To improve it, standardize financial options, shorten time from exam to start, and build a consistent follow-up process for “not today” patients.

What does Net Production vs. Net Collection measure, and what’s a healthy range?

It shows how well you’re converting produced revenue into collected revenue using a rolling 3-month view. Formula: 3-Month Avg Net Production ÷ 3-Month Avg Net Collection. Benchmark: 5–20% (infographic lists a U.S. average of 3.6%). If you’re under target, focus on AR follow-up, autopay adoption, failed-payment workflows, and insurance aging.

What efficiency metrics matter most (Over EDC, no-shows, repairs), and what are the benchmarks?

These metrics highlight where schedules and chair time are lost: Patients Over EDC, calculated as Patients Over EDC divided by Total Active Patients (with a benchmark of less than 10% and a U.S. average of 27%); No-Shows, calculated as Total No-Shows divided by Total Appointments Scheduled (benchmark less than 5%); and Repairs, calculated as Total Repair Visits divided by Total Appointments Completed (benchmark less than 5%, with a U.S. average of 8%). If any of these rates are high, it’s important to tighten appointment confirmations, reduce breakage through patient education, standardize emergency visit criteria, and audit clinical causes of extended treatment.
Author:
References