Data at a Glance: 10 Essential Metrics for Orthodontic Practice Growth​ Infographic

September 26, 2025
|
2
min read
Stay up to date
Subscribe to our newsletter
breakdown of statistics to track for orthodontic practice growth
Leaky Bucket Calculator
New patient adds
Less 10% no-show
Exams expected
Less exams completed
Difference (opportunity)
Less 20% Observation
Apply 60.6% acceptance
# of starts
Avg contract amount
Total Lost Opportunities
Author:

FAQs

What are the most important orthodontic growth metrics to track?

Track a tight set that covers your funnel (leads, exams, starts), revenue health, and operational drag: New Patient Adds to Exams, Case Acceptance, Starts from Observation, Phase 1 to Phase 2 Conversion, Average Contract Amount, Net Production vs. Net Collection, Starts Paid in Full, Patients Over EDC, No-Shows, and Repairs.

How do you calculate New Patient Adds to Exams, and what’s a strong benchmark?

Formula: Total Exams ÷ New Patients Added. Benchmark: >90% (infographic lists a U.S. average of 81%). If you’re low, tighten speed-to-schedule, confirmation/reminders, and remove friction before the first appointment.

How do you calculate case acceptance rate, and what should you aim for?

Formula: Treatment Starts (less Phase 2) ÷ Number of Exams Seen. Benchmark: 70–80%. To improve it, standardize financial options, shorten time from exam to start, and build a consistent follow-up process for “not today” patients.

What does Net Production vs. Net Collection measure, and what’s a healthy range?

It shows how well you’re converting produced revenue into collected revenue using a rolling 3-month view. Formula: 3-Month Avg Net Production ÷ 3-Month Avg Net Collection. Benchmark: 5–20% (infographic lists a U.S. average of 3.6%). If you’re under target, focus on AR follow-up, autopay adoption, failed-payment workflows, and insurance aging.

What efficiency metrics matter most (Over EDC, no-shows, repairs), and what are the benchmarks?

These metrics highlight where schedules and chair time are lost: Patients Over EDC, calculated as Patients Over EDC divided by Total Active Patients (with a benchmark of less than 10% and a U.S. average of 27%); No-Shows, calculated as Total No-Shows divided by Total Appointments Scheduled (benchmark less than 5%); and Repairs, calculated as Total Repair Visits divided by Total Appointments Completed (benchmark less than 5%, with a U.S. average of 8%). If any of these rates are high, it’s important to tighten appointment confirmations, reduce breakage through patient education, standardize emergency visit criteria, and audit clinical causes of extended treatment.
References